ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Development of a Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Nursing Program Targeting Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Delphi Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To construct a cardiac catheterization laboratory nursing program for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with acute myocardial infarction, providing nurses with scientific and practical behavioral guidance. Methods: A literature review and intra-group discussions were employed to preliminarily construct a nursing program in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The program content underwent two rounds of expert consultation involving 15 specialists to refine the proposal, ultimately forming the final version of the cardiac catheterization laboratory nursing program. The scientific and practical validity of the program is evaluated using the following metrics: expert positivity, expert authority coefficient, Kendall's coefficient of concordance, and concentration of expert opinions. Results: The final cardiac catheterization laboratory nursing program consists of three phases, encompassing a total of 30 items. The response rate for two rounds of expert consultation reached an impressive 100%. Expert authority coefficients were 0.983 and 0.980, respectively. The Kendall's coefficient of concordance was 0.206 and 0.162 (P < 0.001), with high importance scores ranging from 4.13 to 5.00. Concurrently, acceptable coefficients of variation and full-score rates were achieved, indicating substantial expert consensus. Conclusion: The cardiac catheterization laboratory nursing program for patients undergoing PCI with acute myocardial infarction is a scientific and reliable approach, demonstrating practical significance and specialized characteristics. It helps ensure patient safety and improves the quality of care in the cardiac intervention laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.