ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2026
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain.
Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) for Malay-speaking individuals with low back pain (LBP) in Malaysia.
methodsA methodological study was conducted following established international guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. The process included forward-backward translation, expert review, content validation, face validation, and psychometric testing among individuals with LBP. Content and face validity indices were evaluated by rehabilitation professionals (n=8) and individuals with LBP (n=9). Psychometric testing was conducted with 102 participants to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability (n=31), concurrent validity using the Malay Oswestry Disability Index, and known-groups validity.
resultsAll items demonstrated excellent content and face validity (I-CVI, I-FVI, S-CVI/Ave, and S-FVI/Ave=1.00). The Malay RMDQ showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.932) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.996). Concurrent validity with the Malay Oswestry Disability Index was moderate (r=0.742, p<0.001). A preliminary known-groups comparison showed a statistically significant difference in the Malay RMDQ scores between participants with LBP and those without LBP (p=0.03). Conclusion: The Malay RMDQ demonstrated preliminary psychometric support, including evidence of reliability, validity, and cultural appropriateness, for assessing disability in individuals with LBP. Future research should explore its responsiveness and utility in broader populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.