ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2026
Reconnecting Minds to the World: Patient Perspectives on Brain-Computer Interface After High Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To explore the perspectives of individuals with high cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI) regarding expectations, concerns, and desired applications of brain-computer interface (BCI).
methodsA structured focus group interview was conducted with four individuals with chronic high cervical spinal cord injury, all with neurological levels of C4 or above. Pre- and post-interview questionnaires were administered to assess expectations, concerns, and acceptance of BCI before and after discussion. The interview was facilitated by experts in rehabilitation medicine and biomedical engineering, and qualitative data were analyzed inductively to identify key themes.
resultsFive major themes emerged: digital accessibility, offline physical activity, social interactions and psychological health, usability, and acceptance. Participants expressed strong interest in using BCI to improve digital independence, particularly for messaging, online banking, internet use, and smart home control. They also viewed BCI as a potential tool to enhance autonomy in daily activities and reduce reliance on caregivers. Most participants were open to training and, in some cases, invasive procedures; however, concerns regarding surgical safety, device maintenance, reliability, and practical usability were frequently raised. Views on the emotional and social impact of BCI varied across individuals. Questionnaire responses showed increased willingness to undergo invasive procedures after the focus group interview, while expected functional outcomes became more realistic, suggesting that structured group discussion may have shaped participants' understanding of BCI. Conclusion: BCI was perceived as a promising pathway to greater independence, participation, and autonomy among individuals with high C-SCI. These findings emphasize user-centered design and demonstrate how lived experience can guide assistive neurotechnology development in rehabilitation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.