ArticleCancer medicine2026
Oophorectomy-Corrected Ovarian Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality by Subtype, Race, Ethnicity.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost ovarian cancers are detected at advanced stages, with poor outcomes. Ovarian cancer is heterogeneous; the most common subtype, serous ovarian carcinoma, may originate outside of the ovaries. To inform etiologic heterogeneity, prevention, and treatment of ovarian cancer, we conducted the first evaluation of oophorectomy-corrected incidence and mortality trends of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers.
methodsOvarian cancer incidence, survival, and incidence-based mortality overall and by subtype were analyzed using the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-22 and SEER17 databases including cases from 2000 to 2019, with oophorectomy correction based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Rates were age adjusted per 100,000 person-years; annual percent changes in rates were calculated.
resultsAge-adjusted prevalence of oophorectomy changed minimally between 2000 and 2019 and was highest among Non-Hispanic White women. Oophorectomy-correction increased ovarian cancer incidence rates by 23% on average. Ovarian cancer incidence decreased by 2% between 2000 and 2019, with a stronger reduction observed in recent years. Fallopian tube cancer incidence increased by 7% from 2000 to 2019. Relative 5-year survival was lowest among Non-Hispanic Black women even after accounting for histotype and stage. Ovarian cancer mortality decreased by 1.8% between 2000 and 2019. Serous carcinomas contributed to 68% of ovarian cancer cases, but 83% of all ovarian cancer deaths.
conclusionsThe reasons for decreasing ovarian cancer incidence are not understood. There is evidence for some reclassification of primary ovarian to primary fallopian tube cancers. Low survival rates in Non-Hispanic Black women point to disparities along the continuum of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.