ArticleBMC nutrition2026
Developing new energy intake reference values for the Saudi population.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estimating dietary intake and nutrient adequacy among adults in Saudi Arabia: a population-based assessment.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study updates the average requirement for energy intake (AR-EI) for the Saudi population, thereby addressing outdated references. Previous estimates relied on generalized equations and non-specific data, which often led to overestimations. This study aimed to establish new AR-EI values for Saudi population.
methodsThe study methodology combined two complementary approaches to estimate energy requirements. For adults, a factorial approach was used, incorporating physical activity levels observed in the Saudi population along with reference values for body weight and height, applied in published Saudi predictive equations for Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR). For infants, children, and adolescents (0-17 years), the study used Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) predictive equations derived from multi-country doubly labeled water (DLW) studies.
resultsAfter calculating the requirements across different age groups and sexes, the value representing the average that meets the needs of 50% of the population was identified and adopted as the AR-EI. The AR-EI values ranged from 393 kcal/day during the first six months to 778 kcal/day by 12 months for male infants, while female infants required 364-748 kcal/day. Among children and adolescents, AR-EI values ranged from 912 to 3147 kcal/day. For adults, the AR-EI was estimated at 2207 kcal/day for men and 1708 kcal/day for women under current activity levels. With increased physical activity, these requirements rose to 3153 kcal/day for men and 2440 kcal/day for women.
conclusionsThis study identified significant overestimations in previous references owing to the reliance on generalized equations and outdated data. By incorporating Saudi-specific data, these findings provide accurate and practical benchmarks for energy intake. These results serve as a foundation for evidence-based nutritional guidelines, promoting public health and reducing the incidence of diet-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.