Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332825›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Nationwide seroepidemiology of canine exposure to Ehrlichia canis and Babesia spp. in Portugal (2015-2025): One Health biosentinel surveillance.

Ricardo Lopes, Lima de Carvalho, Vanessa Silva, Cátia Fernandes, Ana Patrícia Lopes, Elsa Leclerc Duarte, Luís Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Coelho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ricardo LopesCEDIVET Veterinary Laboratories, Lionesa Business Hub, Leça do Balio, Portugal.
Lima de CarvalhoCEDIVET Veterinary Laboratories, Lionesa Business Hub, Leça do Balio, Portugal.
Vanessa SilvaCEDIVET Veterinary Laboratories, Lionesa Business Hub, Leça do Balio, Portugal.
Cátia FernandesAniCura Santa Marinha Veterinary Hospital, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Ana Patrícia LopesDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Elsa Leclerc DuarteDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Science and Technology, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Luís CardosoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal. lcardoso@utad.pt.
Ana Cláudia CoelhoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEhrlichia canis and canine Babesia spp. are widely distributed tick-borne pathogens of veterinary and One Health relevance. Contemporary nationwide data on canine exposure and associated determinants in Portugal are limited. This study aimed to estimate seropositivity proportions and explore epidemiological determinants of exposure to E. canis and Babesia spp. in clinically suspected dogs from Portugal over an 11-year period (2015-2025).

methodsSerum samples from 2960 dogs collected between 2015 and 2025 were analysed using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits to detect immunoglobulin G antibodies to E. canis and Babesia spp. Associations with demographic and geographic variables were assessed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify potential risk factors (P < 0.05), and model performance was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Nagelkerke's R

resultsOverall seropositivity was 4.0% (116/2,872) for E. canis and 12.0% (337/2,818) for Babesia spp. Borderline results accounted for 3.0% (88/2,960) and 4.8% (142/2,960), respectively. E. canis seropositivity varied significantly by Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics level 2 region (P < 0.001), with highest values in the Algarve (15.3%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.3, P < 0.001) and Setúbal Peninsula (50.0%; OR = 23.9, P = 0.025). Age was associated with E. canis exposure (P = 0.014), with increased odds in dogs aged 6 to < 11 years and ≥ 11 years (both OR = 2.1, P < 0.05). No significant geographical association was observed for Babesia spp. (P = 0.803), and sex and age were not significant predictors. Seropositivity to Babesia spp. was a risk factor for seropositivity to E. canis (OR = 3.6, P < 0.001). Multivariable models retained no independent predictors (Nagelkerke R

conclusionsThis study provides a nationwide, long-term retrospective assessment of serological exposure to E. canis and Babesia spp. among clinically suspect dogs in Portugal. Exposure to E. canis showed marked regional heterogeneity, particularly in southern Portugal, whereas Babesia spp. showed no significant regional association. Co-seropositivity, although uncommon, is consistent with shared tick-borne exposure pathways. These findings support risk-based tick control and continued surveillance within a One Health framework.

Indexed as

BabesiaBabesiosisDog DiseasesEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ProtozoanDogsFemaleImmunoglobulin GMalePortugalRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GBabesia spp.BiosentinelsCanine seropositivityEhrlichia canisOne HealthTick-borne infectionsVector-borne diseasesZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID42332825
PMCPMC13540257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.