ArticleBMC health services research2026
Determining constructs of high-quality rural health student placements: a multiple case ECOUTER study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople living in regional, rural and remote communities experience inequitable access to health services compared with people living in metropolitan areas, in part due to the maldistribution of the health workforce. Health student placements in rural settings, a type of work-integrated learning, are a key approach to developing a sustainable rural health workforce in Australia and internationally. Proxies for quality in rural health student placements, including student satisfaction and intention to practice in rural settings, have been used to inform rural health placement development and facilitation. However, the determining constructs of high-quality rural health student placements in Australia are unknown.
methodsA multiple case study design was adopted, drawing on the Employing COnceptUal schema for policy and Translation Engagement in Research (ECOUTER) methodology to iteratively collect and analyse data. Within each case, participants comprised Australian University Departments of Rural Health staff involved in designing, delivering, administrating and/or evaluating rural health student placements. In each case, participants identified features that contribute to high-quality rural health student placements and listed these on a virtual case mindmap. Case focus groups were conducted to refine top-level and sub features on each mindmap. Cross-case analysis identified overarching constructs and sub-constructs, which were refined by cross-case focus group participants.
resultsEighty-six people across ten cases participated in this study. Nine constructs determining high-quality rural health student placements were identified: placement planning, student selection, stakeholder communication and collaboration, placement orientation, student supervision, logistical resources, learning opportunities, connecting with the rural community, and student wellbeing and supports. The final cross-case focus group resulted in strong construct agreement from participants across diverse regional, rural, and remote Australian contexts.
conclusionsNine interconnected and contextually dependent constructs determine high-quality health student placements in regional, rural and remote communities, emphasising the complexity associated with providing a high-quality form of this work-integrated learning opportunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.