Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332784›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2026

Tumor-naïve ctDNA detection with deep learning-enhanced error suppression for sensitive mutation calling.

Shaya Akbarinejad, Sarah Doppler, Jos de Graaf, Jelena Pistolic-Kraft, Valesca Bukur, Christian Albrecht, Nathalie Buchholz, Simge Özenoglu, Ugur Sahin, Jonas Ibn-Salem and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shaya AkbarinejadTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Sarah DopplerTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Jos de GraafTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Jelena Pistolic-KraftTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Valesca BukurTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Christian AlbrechtTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Nathalie BuchholzTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Simge ÖzenogluTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Ugur SahinTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Jonas Ibn-SalemTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany. jonas.ibn-salem@tron-mainz.de.
David WeberTRON - Translational Oncology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz gGmbH, Freiligrathstraße 12, Mainz, 55131, Germany. david.weber@tron-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection offers minimally invasive monitoring of cancer from blood samples. While tumor-informed approaches are sensitive, their clinical application is limited by cost, tissue availability, and turnaround time. In contrast, tumor-naïve assays offer faster turnaround times and broader applicability, but often sacrifice sensitivity.

methodsHere, we developed DEEPctMUT, a computational pipeline for tumor-naïve ctDNA detection that integrates unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) with three complementary error-polishing strategies: (1) machine learning-based sequencing error suppression, (2) deep learning-based background noise filtering (DeepES), and (3) removal of clonal hematopoietic and germline variants using patient matched PBMC. We designed an efficient sequencing panel and developed and validated DEEPctMUT using cell lines, spike-in samples, healthy, and CRC plasma samples.

resultsDEEPctMUT accurately detected mutations down to 0.03% variant allele frequency (VAF), outperforming other tumor-naïve methods. In a head-to-head comparison, our pipeline identified pre-surgical CRC cases with 100% sensitivity, whereas the Roche Avenio Surveillance Kit achieved only 50% sensitivity. Furthermore, a panel-independent version of DEEPctMUT could improve the performance of Roche Avenio data without additional assay-specific training. We provide an extensive ground-truth dataset and make DEEPctMUT, including all trained models, available as an easy-to-use Nextflow pipeline.

conclusionsBy using advanced computational error-polishing techniques, DEEPctMUT can substantially reduce technical artifacts, allowing our tumor-naïve method to achieve a sensitivity comparable to tumor-informed approaches.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNADeep LearningMutationNeoplasmsCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisHumansCirculating Tumor DNActDNA mutation detectionDeep learningLiquid biopsyMachine learningSomatic variant callingTumor-naïve ctDNA assay

Identifiers

PMID42332784
PMCPMC13289477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.