ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Implementing the collaborative chronic care model for mental health: a nonrandomized clinical trial.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05997836 (Behavioral Health Interdisciplinary Program - Collaborative Chronic Care Model), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Behavioral Health Interdisciplinary Program - Collaborative Chronic Care Model (BHIP-CCM) Enhancement Project 2.0 (QUE 20-026)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollaborative chronic care models (CCMs) are an evidence-based way to structure care in outpatient mental health settings. This project investigated whether implementation facilitation (IF) can enhance CCM-consistent outpatient mental health care and reduce mental health hospitalizations compared with centralized technical assistance (CTA).
methodsThis was a stepped wedge hybrid 2 implementation-effectiveness trial in outpatient mental health clinics at eight US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (four waves, two sites each) conducted from 2022 to 2024. Staff participants included clinicians involved in delivering team-based outpatient mental health care. The patient sample consisted of US military veterans treated by 42 participating mental health teams. IF was used for 8-9 months to increase alignment with CCM principles at each participating site. All the sites (including eight comparison sites that were nonrandomized but matched on key variables) had access to CTA. The coprimary outcomes were (a) alignment with CCM-based care evaluated using the Role Clarity and Team Primacy subscales of the Team Development Measure [TDM], and (b) mental health hospitalizations extracted from the electronic health record during the year following initiation of IF.
resultsThe sample included n = 20,835 patients at participating sites and n = 60,221 patients at comparison sites. The pre-implementation TDM was completed by 134 staff members, and post-implementation TDM was completed by 109 staff members. Role Clarity and Team Primacy subscales of the TDM demonstrated small, nonstatistically significant improvement after completing IF (p = 0.33[t-value: 0.97] and 0.14 [t-value: 1.48], respectively). Multivariate generalized linear mixed models indicated participating sites had similar mental health hospitalization rates following IF initiation compared to sites receiving CTA alone.
conclusionThis trial revealed that IF to enhance CCM-consistent clinical practices in outpatient mental health teams was associated with small improvements in team functioning that did not achieve statistical significance. Mental health hospitalization rates did not differ for sites using IF versus CTA. TDM-based assessments of team functioning at baseline were similar to post-implementation results from a prior trial, suggesting that CTA to support team-based care may have increased team functioning in these settings prior to trial initiation.
trial registrationNCT05997836. Retrospectively registered 18 August 2023: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05997836?term=NCT05997836%26rank=1 . Ethical approval: This evaluation was conducted as a quality improvement activity for VA and was deemed by the R&D Committee at the VA Boston Healthcare System not to be research; therefore, it was not subject to IRB review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.