ReviewJournal of biological engineering2026
Research progress and applications of functional hydrogels in nasal wound healing.
Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of PuraSinus Versus Bioresorbable Nasal Dressings in Improving Patient Comfort During Postoperative Debridements
Novel Application of RADA16 Hydrogel in Reducing Sinonasal Morbidity After Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nasal wound healing presents a distinct clinical challenge in otorhinolaryngology, complicated by the unique physicochemical environment of the nasal cavity-including a slightly acidic mucosal pH (≈ 6.3-6.9), shear-thinning mucus rheology (healthy viscosity ≈ 0.1-1 Pa·s, elevated to 1.6-3.2 Pa·s in chronic sinusitis), continuous mucociliary clearance (MCC) with ciliary beat frequencies of ~ 10 Hz, and enzymatic activity dominated by lysozyme. Conventional nasal packing materials-such as Vaseline gauze and polyvinyl alcohol sponges-suffer from poor biocompatibility, rigid mechanical properties, and traumatic removal, failing to satisfy these demanding physicochemical constraints. Functional hydrogels, owing to their tunable viscoelasticity, dynamic covalent or supramolecular crosslinking, and intrinsic responsiveness to pH, reactive oxygen species (ROS), temperature, and enzymes, have emerged as a next-generation solution. This review systematically profiles the physicochemical microenvironment of the nasal wound; reclassifies hydrogel systems by polymer backbone (natural polysaccharides/proteins vs. synthetic polymers) and crosslinking chemistry (dynamic covalent bonds: Schiff base, disulfide, boronic ester vs. supramolecular: host-guest, hydrogen bonding); and examines reaction pathways, degradation kinetics, and mechanical matching with nasal mucosa. Representative systems are critically evaluated, including: (i) the RADA16 self-assembling peptide hydrogel, which in randomized clinical trials reduced postoperative adhesion by 91-100% compared with gelatin-thrombin and bioresorbable controls; (ii) TSPBA/PVA ROS-responsive hydrogels that scavenge H₂O₂ via boronic ester cleavage (second-order rate constant ≈ 0.1-1 M⁻¹·s⁻¹), prolonging mucosal retention to 24 h; (iii) pNIPAAm-based thermoresponsive systems with LCST ≈ 32 °C, the critical implications of which for the physiological nasal temperature range (30-34 °C) are discussed. We further analyze cell-material interactions governing macrophage M1→M2 polarization, epithelial/fibroblast behavior, and ciliary function. Ongoing clinical trials (NCT04970966, NCT05898074) and persistent translational challenges-including sterilization, long-term in vivo safety, and standardized large-scale production-are critically addressed, offering a materials-science-focused framework for the design of next-generation nasal hydrogels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.