Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332734›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

'A ripple effect of learning': evaluating intraprofessional workplace learning in postgraduate medical education through collective evaluation.

M van der Ven, D Van Asselt, N Looman, C Fluit, W Kuijer-Siebelink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M van der VenGeriatric Medicine Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, the Netherlands. Maarten.vanderven@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-7551
D Van AsseltGeriatric Medicine Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2438-9495
N LoomanPrimary & Community Care Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2104-6449
C FluitDepartment of Research on Learning and Education, Radboud University Medical Center Health Academy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-9339
W Kuijer-SiebelinkDepartment of Research on Learning and Education, Radboud University Medical Center Health Academy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7009-3378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquiring competencies in intraprofessional collaboration (IntraPC) across the primary care (PC)-secondary care (SC) interface is essential to prevent adverse outcomes in the increasingly complex care for older adults. The workplace-based learning intervention Secondary Primary care Intraprofessional Collaboration Education (SPICE) was developed to foster IntraPC learning among co-located PC and SC residents during a geriatric rotation in the Netherlands. Understanding how learning through SPICE translates into clinical practice remains challenging and may require innovative evaluation methods. This study explored the longer-term effects of SPICE using a new collective evaluation approach.

methodsWe used the effects forum, a collective evaluation method originating from applied social sciences that combines timeline analysis, mixed focus groups, and knowledge co-construction. PC and SC residents, supervisors, and patients collaboratively constructed a timeline of IntraPC learning moments during SPICE and the following six months. Participants discussed how and why these moments influenced their collaborative behavior and clinical practice. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsSeventeen participants took part in two distinct effects forums. Residents reported gaining insight into patients' care continuum and developing greater mutual understanding across PC and SC. This facilitated more proactive handovers, which could improve continuity across care settings. Residents also transferred IntraPC learning into new contexts through reflection and dialogue, creating a ripple effect of learning that extending beyond the initial intervention.

conclusionWorkplace-based IntraPC learning can lead to meaningful changes in collaborative behavior and clinical practice. By capturing shared experiences over time, the effects forum provided insight into how learning translated into practice and supported ongoing reflection. Collective evaluation offers a valuable approach to understanding the impact of workplace learning interventions in complex healthcare settings, with potential implications for further improving continuity and patient safety through IntraPC learning across the PC-SC interface.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateGeriatricsPrimary Health CareClinical CompetenceCooperative BehaviorFocus GroupsHumansInternship and ResidencyInterprofessional RelationsLearningNetherlandsWorkplaceCollective evaluationIntraprofessional collaborationMedical educationPrimary careSecondary care

Identifiers

PMID42332734
PMCPMC13543373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.