ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Asymmetric uveal effusion in bilateral nanophthalmos presenting as unilateral secondary angle closure: a rare case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report a rare case of unilateral secondary angle closure in a young male with bilateral nanophthalmos caused by spontaneous supraciliary and choroidal effusion, highlighting the diagnostic role of multimodal imaging and the importance of individualized management. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old male, a known case of hyperopia in both eyes, presented with gradual visual loss in both his eyes. Examination revealed asymmetric anterior chamber depth with shallowing in right eye (RE) > left eye (LE), bilateral short axial lengths, and a 360° choroidal detachment in the RE, while the fellow eye remained clinically stable. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) confirmed supraciliary effusion in the affected eye, explaining the secondary angle closure mechanism. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Despite initial conservative management with oral & topical steroids, he had persistent choroidal effusion and was advised surgical intervention. He underwent single quadrant posterior sclerostomy, which resulted in significant resolution of effusions with anatomical and visual improvement.
conclusionThis case highlights the importance of considering spontaneous supraciliary effusion as a possible cause for unilateral secondary angle closure in short eyes. Underscores the importance of early multimodal imaging and timely posterior sclerostomy to preserve vision when medical therapy is unsuccessful. Asymmetrical angle closure could be a clinical clue to detect uveal effusions in nanophthalmos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.