ArticleBMC surgery2026
Impact of surgical approach and anastomosis distance on low anterior resection syndrome.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent functional disorder following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. This study aimed to assess the impact of surgical approach and anastomosis distance on LARS development.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 115 patients who underwent low anterior resection without diverting stoma between 2012 and 2024. Patients were stratified using the validated LARS score questionnaire. Surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic) and clinicopathologic features were compared across LARS severity levels. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Spearman correlation tests.
resultsNo significant difference in LARS scores was found among open, laparoscopic, and robotic groups (p=0.130), but open surgery showed higher scores compared to minimally invasive surgery (p=0.045). Anastomosis distance ≤4 cm from the anal verge was strongly associated with higher LARS incidence (p<0.001). Other factors, including age, tumor stage, neoadjuvant therapy, and follow-up duration, were not significantly associated with LARS. The most severe symptoms were urgency and clustering. Symptoms plateaued around 4 years postoperatively.
conclusionLARS remains a common complication after rectal cancer surgery. Minimally invasive surgery and anastomosis distance greater than 4 cm from the anal verge were associated with lower LARS scores. Surgical planning should consider functional outcomes in addition to oncologic safety.
trial registrationThis study does not report the results of a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.