ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Maternal knowledge and clinically relevant care gaps in preterm infant care in Gaza, Palestine: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMothers of premature infants need practical knowledge to support feeding, thermal care, infection prevention, phototherapy safety and discharge preparation. Evidence on domain-specific maternal knowledge in resource-constrained neonatal settings remains limited. This study assessed maternal knowledge of premature infant care in Gaza and explored clinically relevant item-level knowledge gaps to inform future education priorities.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 170 mothers of premature infants admitted to neonatal departments in four government hospitals in the Gaza Strip. A 30-item interviewer-administered questionnaire assessed knowledge across thermoregulation, feeding, phototherapy, and infection and skin care. Descriptive, bivariate and adjusted regression analyses were conducted, with exploratory item-level analyses used to identify clinically relevant knowledge gaps.
resultsOverall knowledge was moderate, with a mean score of 64.1% (SD = 22.3), but 53 mothers (31.2%) had poor knowledge. Knowledge differed across domains (p < 0.001), with feeding the weakest domain (53.6%) and infection and skin care the highest by observed percentage score (73.8%). In the parsimonious adjusted model, not receiving specialist premature-care antenatal follow-up was associated with lower odds of higher knowledge (adjusted OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.97, p = 0.042). Item-level findings showed clinically relevant gaps in feeding tolerance, nil per os (NPO) management, nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding, phototherapy safety, handling practices and umbilical cord care.
conclusionsAlthough overall maternal knowledge was moderate, this masked clinically important gaps in practical caregiving domains, particularly feeding, phototherapy safety, handling practices and umbilical cord care. Given the cross-sectional design, findings should not be interpreted causally. These findings may inform the development and future evaluation of domain-specific education tools for antenatal counselling, bedside teaching and discharge preparation in similar constrained neonatal settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.