ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Motivation and challenges in decision making for gastrostomy tube placement and use: a focus on patients with cancer and dysphagia.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrostomy tube placement is the preferred modality for long-term nutritional management in individuals with oral feeding disorders. However, acceptance of this intervention is often impeded by reluctance to discontinue oral feeding, concerns about increased caregiver burden, and apprehension regarding life prolongation with diminished quality of life. These factors may generate decisional conflict, negatively affecting patients' physical and psychological well-being and treatment outcomes. In this study, we aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers influencing gastrostomy-related decision-making among patients with cancer and dysphagia, providing a theoretical and empirical basis for developing culturally tailored decision aids and structured communication pathways.
methodsA qualitative descriptive design was employed. In-depth one-on-one interviews were conducted with 18 patients with cancer and dysphagia who had engaged in gastrostomy decision-making at two tertiary hospitals in Fujian Province, China. The transcripts were coded using NVivo and analyzed using conventional content analysis.
resultsThree overarching themes with seven subthemes were identified. Theme 1 included decision-making motivation, which comprised three subthemes: disease perception and survival needs, supportive communication from healthcare providers, and support from family members and peers. Theme 2 included decision-making challenges, which included two subthemes: emotional-rational dissonance and insufficient decision-making information. Theme 3 comprised decision-making optimization and included two subthemes: enhancing the transparency of gastrostomy-related information and improving the efficacy of healthcare provider-patient communication.
conclusionsEffective healthcare provider-patient communication and support from family members and peers emerged as key facilitators of decision-making regarding gastrostomy tube placement, whereas emotional-rational conflicts and informational deficits constituted major barriers. Future efforts should focus on developing culturally tailored, multimodal decision aids integrating paper and digital formats, establishing structured communication pathways that integrate these tools, and strengthening family-peer support while ensuring that autonomous decisions are aligned with patient values. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.