Trial reportBMC pediatrics2026
Impact of telemonitoring on glycemic control and quality of life in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes, single center interventional control study.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelehealth initiatives offer valuable alternatives for enhancing diabetes management and clinician-patient engagement. This study compared two diabetes education approaches for glycemic outcomes: standard method includes regular physical visits at outpatient clinic versus telemonitoring.
methodsWe conducted an interventional trial involving 140 pediatric patients with Type 1 diabetes (T1D), who were equally randomized into a telecounseling group (Intervention group, n = 70) and a standard care group (Control group, n = 70). Participants in Intervention group received weekly telephone consultations from diabetes educators, during which glucose records, dietary patterns, and insulin dose adjustments were reviewed. Control group received diabetes education during routine outpatient clinic visits. Both groups were followed up initially at the start of the study and at 6 months. Socioeconomic status and quality of life (QoL) were assessed in all participants.
resultsGlycemic control differed significantly between groups. Mean HbA1c values were 8.21 ± 1.82 SDS (Intervention group) versus 9.25 ± 2.22 SDS (Control group). Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episodes were higher in Control group (18%) vs. (1.7%) in Intervention group, p = 0.001. Complication rates (lipodystrophy, proteinuria, dyslipidemia) were elevated in Control group (37.7%) vs. (15.5%) in Intervention group, p = 0.01. Intervention group demonstrated significantly improved QoL scores (p = 0.002).
conclusionThe telemedicine strategy helped to achieve significantly greater HbA1c reductions and fewer diabetes-related complications versus conventional care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.