ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Integrating host mRNA signatures and clinical trajectories with machine learning for risk stratification and survival prediction in sepsis: an ICU-based prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis remains a leading cause of death in critically ill patients. Host mRNA biomarkers may provide complementary biological information for prognostic assessment in sepsis. This study aimed to integrate host mRNA biomarkers and clinical parameters to develop and compare predictive models for short-term mortality using both conventional and machine learning (ML) approaches.
methodsIn this prospective ICU study (Dec 2022-Mar 2024), 249 patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria were initially enrolled, and 198 patients with available host mRNA measurements were included in the final analysis. 35 candidate mRNAs were quantified using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). After initial transcriptomic screening and LASSO-based feature selection, one immune transcript (PAX5) and four clinical variables (hematologic disease, sex, SOFA score, positive blood culture) were retained for model development. Five models were evaluated for predicting 7-, 14-, and 28-day mortality, including Cox proportional hazards regression, random survival forest (RSF), Deep Survival Analysis (DeepSurv), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Model discrimination was assessed using AUCs and compared using DeLong's test. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap 0.632 method.
resultsAmong the 198 patients included in the final analysis, mortality was 18.7% at 7 days, 28.3% at 14 days, and 30.3% at 28 days. RSF achieved the highest AUCs for 7-, 14-, and 28-day mortality (0.834, 0.854, and 0.847, respectively). DeLong's test showed that RSF significantly outperformed Cox regression, DeepSurv, and survival SVM at all time points, while its performance was comparable to XGBoost. Bootstrap 0.632 internal validation confirmed favorable overall performance of RSF. In variable importance analysis, hematologic disease, sex, SOFA score, PAX5 and positive blood culture were among the main contributors to model performance. Incremental analysis showed that clinical variables contributed the largest improvement beyond SOFA, whereas inclusion of PAX5 provided complementary prognostic value.
conclusionThe integration of host mRNA biomarkers with clinical parameters supported the development of a ML-based prognostic framework for short-term mortality in sepsis. RSF showed favorable discriminative performance in this cohort and performed comparably to XGBoost. PAX5 may serve as a complementary prognostic biomarker, although clinical variables remained the dominant contributors to model discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.