Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332583›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026

Beyond the Cox model: a log-logistic accelerated failure time frailty model for analysing first birth timing in Zimbabwe.

Hilary Takunda Takawira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hilary Takunda TakawiraZvitambo Institute of Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe. takawirahilary@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-7669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cox proportional hazards (PH) model is the most common approach for analyzing time-to-event data in public health. However, its reliance on the proportional hazards' assumption is a key limitation, often violated in demographic research. This study illustrates a comprehensive model selection framework, comparing the performance of various parametric accelerated failure time (AFT) and frailty models as robust alternatives when the PH assumption fails, using data on the timing of first birth as a case study.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of time to first birth among 9,955 women from the 2015 Zimbabwe Demographic and Health Survey. After confirming violations of the PH assumption using Schoenfeld residuals, we systematically compared the fit of several parametric models' exponential, Weibull, log-normal, and log-logistic with and without gamma-shared frailty terms. Model selection was based on the Akaike (AIC) and Bayesian (BIC) Information Criteria.

resultsThe log-logistic AFT model with gamma frailty showed improved relative fit for this dataset, accommodating a non-monotonic hazard and accounting for unobserved regional heterogeneity (θ = 0.671, p<0.001). The model yielded interpretable time ratio (TR) estimates, where higher education (TR=1.11) and later cohabitation (TR=1.25) were associated with delayed first birth, while marriage (TR=0.98) and contraceptive use (TR=0.97) were associated with earlier timing. In contrast, standard parametric models and the Cox model were suboptimal for this dataset.

conclusionThis study provides an empirical demonstration of how AFT models with frailty terms can be applied in settings where the proportional hazards assumption is violated. The log-logistic frailty model showed improved relative fit for this dataset and offers an interpretable framework for analysing time-to-event outcomes with clustered data.

Indexed as

ParturitionTime FactorsAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsModels, StatisticalPregnancyProportional Hazards ModelsYoung AdultZimbabweAccelerated failure timeFrailty modelModel selectionParametric modelsSurvival analysisTime to first birth

Identifiers

PMID42332583
PMCPMC13539932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.