Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332565›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Multi-omics analysis identifies key genes and functional loci affecting teat number in American Large White and Landrace pigs and their application in optimizing genomic selection models.

Jinfeng Ma, Xinjie Ai, Yun Hao, Yanzhen Yin, Qian Liu, Jianghui Yu, Jin Zhou, Fusheng Wang, Liang Shuai, Yikun Jin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jinfeng MaKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Xinjie AiKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yun HaoKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yanzhen YinKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Qian LiuKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Jianghui YuKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Jin ZhouKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Fusheng WangJiangxi Jia Da Group Co., Ltd, Hanzhou, 341000, China.
Liang ShuaiJiangxi Jia Da Group Co., Ltd, Hanzhou, 341000, China.
Yikun JinJiangxi Jia Da Group Co., Ltd, Hanzhou, 341000, China.
Ruihua HuangKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Qingbo ZhaoKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. zhaoqingbo@njau.edu.cn.
Pinghua LiKey Laboratory of Pig Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Swine Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. lipinghua718@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

Basic Research Program of Jiangsu (BK20251554) BK20251554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeat number is a crucial economic trait in pigs. It directly affects the ability of sows to lactate, which in turn influences the survival and health of piglets. The teat number of French Large White pigs is close to 16, while the teat number of American Large White and Landrace pigs is about 14. In order to improve the teat number of American Landrace and Large White pigs through molecular approaches and precise breeding techniques, we genotyped 2,131 American Landrace and 4,564 American Large White with teat number phenotype using a 50 K SNP chip. Then, the SNP-chip data was imputed to the level of whole-genome sequencing (iWGS). Based on iWGS data, we conducted GWAS to identify novel, significant SNPs associated with teat number and to incorporate them into genomic selection.

resultsIn Landrace pigs, significant SNPs for TTN mapped to SSC2, SSC7, SSC8, and SSC14; the SSC8 and SSC14 effects are novel. LTN mapped to SSC7, RTN to SSC7 and SSC8. The lead SSC7 SNP explained 2.60% of TTN phenotypic variance. In Large White pigs, significant SNPs were detected on SSC7 and SSC10 for TTN; SSC7, SSC10, and SSC12 for LTN; and SSC7 and SSC10 for RTN. The most significant locus on SSC7 accounted for 2.99% of the phenotypic variance in TTN. Additionally, a multi-population meta-analysis detected significant novel SNPs for LTN on SSC1 and SSC8. By utilizing Bayesian fine mapping, the most precise QTL confidence interval on SSC7 for both TTN and RTN in Large White pigs was reduced to 40 kb. By integrating functional gene annotation with RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data from Erhualian and Bamaxiang pigs mammary placodes at embryonic day 26, we prioritized PTPN13, TRPV3, ZDHHC13, and BRD2 as novel candidate genes for teat number. We then incorporated the significant SNPs to GBLUP and benchmarked genomic-selection accuracy. In both breeds, fitting the top SNP as fixed maximized prediction for TTN and RTN, whereas treating all significant loci as an additional random effect optimized LTN.

conclusionsOur findings provide a theoretical basis for dissecting new key genes affecting teat number and for advancing molecular breeding of teat number in pigs.

Indexed as

GenomicsMammary Glands, AnimalSelection, GeneticAnimalsBreedingFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeMultiomicsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociSwineCandidate geneFine mappingGenomic selectionMulti-omicsPigTeat number

Identifiers

PMID42332565
PMCPMC13540930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.