ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Plastome evolution and phylogenomic relationships in Ajuga (Lamiaceae, Ajugoideae).
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAjuga is currently known to include approximately 69 species, with a combined distribution extending throughout Eurasia, Africa, and Australia. Its popularity and significance are largely based on an extensive history of medicinal and horticultural use. It is divided into two sections based on morphological characters, and this sectional classification is also reflected in pronounced geographic patterns. Although previous studies have largely focused on Ajuga sect. Ajuga in East Asia, A. sect. Chamaepithys, which ranges from the Mediterranean to Central Asia, remains insufficiently sampled, thereby limiting a comprehensive understanding of infrageneric sectional relationships within the genus. Here, we generated complete plastid genomes for 12 species representing both sections of the genus and used these data to characterize plastome structure and infer evolutionary relationships.
resultsIn this study, 21 Ajuga plastomes were analyzed, including 12 newly sequenced plastomes and 9 previously published plastomes representing 19 species. Comparative analyses showed that all plastomes exhibited a highly conserved quadripartite structure, with genome sizes ranging from 149,963 to 150,740 bp and GC contents varying from 38.2% to 38.3%. Each plastome contained 133 genes, including 88 protein-coding genes, 37 transfer RNA genes, and 8 ribosomal RNA genes. The boundaries between the inverted repeat (IR) and single-copy (SC) regions were also highly conserved across species. In addition, 796 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), 874 long repeat sequences (LRSs), and 12 highly variable regions (ccsA-ndhD, ndhF-rpl32, petA-psbJ, rpl32-trnL-UAG, rps2-rpoC2, trnH-GUG-psbA, trnK-UUU-rps16, trnP-UGG-psaJ, trnT-UGU-trnL-UAA, ycf15-trnL-CAA, ndhF, and ycf1) were identified among the 21 plastomes. Phylogenetic analyses based on four datasets and conducted using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference recovered two major clades corresponding to the traditionally recognized sectional classification, with one distributed from the Mediterranean to Central Asia and the other in East Asia.
conclusionThis study represents the most comprehensive plastome-based sampling of Ajuga to date, including representative species from the Mediterranean, Central Asia, and East Asia. Our results have significantly enhanced our understanding of its infrageneric relationships. The plastome resources generated in this study provide a valuable foundation for future research on species delimitation, phylogeny, and the evolutionary history of Ajuga.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.