Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332557›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Nitrogen and water application differentially influence nutritional value and mineral content in grains of a genetically diverse sorghum germplasm collection.

Mehmet Bedir, Muhammad Tanveer Altaf, Waqas Liaqat, Gönül Cömertpay, Christian Hermans, Volkan Çatalkaya, Nergiz Çoban, İbrahim Cerit, Celaleddin Barutçular, Tolga Karaköy and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mehmet Bedir *Department of Plant Production and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Sivas, 58140, Türkiye.
Muhammad Tanveer Altaf *Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Pazar, Türkiye.
Waqas Liaqat *Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Pazar, Türkiye.
Gönül CömertpayEastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana, 01370, Türkiye.
Christian HermansCrop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium.
Volkan ÇatalkayaEastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana, 01370, Türkiye.
Nergiz ÇobanEastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana, 01370, Türkiye.
İbrahim CeritEastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana, 01370, Türkiye.
Celaleddin BarutçularDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Çukurova University, Adana, 01330, Türkiye.
Tolga KaraköyDepartment of Plant Production and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Sivas, 58140, Türkiye.
Andres MoralesInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta, La Consulta, M5567, Argentina.
Muhammad Azhar NadeemDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Mersin University, Yenişehir, Mersin, 33343, Türkiye.
Recep Irfan NazlıDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Çukurova University, Adana, 01330, Türkiye.
Ephrem HabyarimanaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502324, India. Ephrem.Habyarimana@icrisat.org.
Ahmad AlsalehDepartment of Agriculture and Food Hemp Research Institute, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, 66200, Türkiye.
Sajid FiazInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Pablo Federico CavagnaroConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza, Luján de Cuyo, M5534, Argentina. cavagnaro.pablo@inta.gob.ar.
Faheem Shehzad BalochDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Mersin University, Yenişehir, Mersin, 33343, Türkiye. balochfaheem13@gmail.com.

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK) 220N276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nutritional profile of sorghum grains, such as antioxidant (AOX) status and mineral content, can be influenced by a number of environmental factors and agricultural practices, as well as by biotic and abiotic stresses. We investigated the impact of contrasting nitrogen (N) and water availability on 15 traits associated with sorghum nutritional value, including AOX capacity (AOX), total phenolics content (TPC), total protein, ash, moisture, and the concentration of 10 macronutrients [nitrogen in leaves (NCL) and grains (NCS), P, K, Mg, Ca] and micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) in grains. To this end, we evaluated a broad and genetically diverse germplasm collection of 124 accessions over two years of field experiments conducted under optimal N and water availability (control, +N+FC100); under N restriction (-N+FC100); and under N and water restriction (-N+FC50).

resultsSignificant effects for treatment, accession, year, and their interactions were found for most traits. In general, N and water restriction treatments were detrimental -as compared to controls- for most traits, as evidenced by decreases in mean values of 10-50% (for -N+FC100) and 8-58% (-N+FC50) consistently found for 11 traits. The most affected variables under -N+FC100 conditions were Zn, Mg, and Cu; and P, Zn, Mg under -N+FC50. In contrast, AOX and TPC levels showed increases in mean values of ~ 11-103% under -N+FC100 and -N+FC50 conditions. These two variables were moderately-to-strongly correlated (r = 0.53-0.96) across all environmental conditions and years, suggesting that phenolic compounds are the main drivers of AOX capacity in sorghum. Results from principal component analysis clearly depicted the strong effects of N-restricted and combined N plus water-restricted conditions on sorghum's nutritional and mineral contents. Genetically-stable accessions with the greatest and lowest performances for each trait and growing condition were selected for breeding purposes.

conclusionsNitrogen and water restrictions strongly -yet differentially- influence nutritional and mineral contents in sorghum, enhancing TPC and AOX while reducing mineral levels. This study characterized a large germplasm collection across various growing conditions and years, facilitating the selection of resilient genotypes for breeding programs aimed at improving nutritional value under changing climatic conditions.

Indexed as

MineralsNitrogenNutritive ValueSorghumWaterAntioxidantsEdible GrainGenetic VariationSeedsAntioxidantsMineralsNitrogenWaterAntioxidantsGenetic diversityMineral contentNitrogen deficitNutritional contentSorghumWater deficit

Identifiers

PMID42332557
PMCPMC13543652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.