Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332428›Full record

ArticleEcology2026

Combining individual and close-kin mark-recapture to design an effective wildlife population survey.

Eiren K Jacobson, Mark V Bravington, Rebecca L Taylor, Irina S Trukhanova, David L Miller, William S Beatty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eiren K JacobsonCentre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling and School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-8367
Mark V BravingtonEstimark Research, Hobart, Australia.
Rebecca L TaylorUS Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Irina S TrukhanovaNorth Pacific Wildlife Consulting, LLC, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-4481
David L MillerIndependent Researcher, Dundee, UK.
William S BeattyUS Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

USGS Science Support Partnership
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) is a promising approach for assessing population size of species that have been difficult to survey using more traditional methods. Here, we combine individual and close-kin mark-recapture in a single modeling framework (ICKMR) and provide an example of study design using this approach for Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens). We develop the ICKMR model and test it using simulated datasets, then use properties of the pseudo-likelihood to investigate the expected precision in estimates of abundance with different proposed survey designs. Our motivating example, the Pacific walrus, is an ice-associated marine mammal found in the Bering and Chukchi seas, where it is an important resource for Indigenous peoples. Pacific walrus abundance declined in the late 20th century, and it is currently a species of conservation concern due to potential impacts of climate change, particularly the loss of sea ice. To reduce uncertainty in population size estimates, researchers undertook a genetic mark-recapture sampling campaign from 2013 to 2017 and collected tissue samples from over 8000 individuals. Another campaign of a similar scale is ongoing (2023-2028). While sample collection was designed for individual mark-recapture, advances in CKMR methods and associated molecular techniques mean that these samples could also be suitable for CKMR. The advantages of CKMR over mark-recapture include an increased effective sample size (because each individual tags itself and its parents, siblings, and offspring) and additional insights into demographic quantities of interest. To make best use of genetic samples, we combine individual mark-recapture (IMR) with CKMR (ICKMR) and investigate whether different sampling strategies can increase precision in estimates of abundance. Our modeling approach includes special considerations for walrus life history, including a multi-year inter-birth interval. We found that expected coefficients of variation (CVs) of the ICKMR estimates of abundance, adult female survival, juvenile female survival, and proportion of breeding females are lower than those expected from IMR alone, and with ICKMR, fewer years of sampling can be conducted to obtain sufficient precision in estimates of abundance. This work demonstrates the utility of ICKMR and could be applicable across a variety of taxa.

Indexed as

WalrusesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesDemographyModels, BiologicalPopulation DensityPopulation Dynamicsclose‐kin mark–recaptureindividual genetic mark–recapturesurvey designwalrus

Identifiers

PMID42332428
PMCPMC13287309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.