Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332377›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026

Elephant space use and habitat selection change across drought timescales.

Irene Bouwman, Tom Claassen, Michael J Chase, Kelly Landen, Mark A J Huijbregts, Marlee A Tucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irene BouwmanDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3585-0406
Tom ClaassenDepartment of Data Science, Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michael J ChaseElephants without Borders, Kasane, Botswana.
Kelly LandenElephants without Borders, Kasane, Botswana.
Mark A J HuijbregtsDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marlee A TuckerDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-3431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Droughts are globally increasing in duration, frequency and intensity, thereby endangering the survival of wildlife species. Understanding how animals behave during drought is essential to develop conservation measures that aid wildlife survival and prevent human-wildlife conflict in a changing climate. Yet, little is known about animal behaviour during drought. Specifically, existing work on animal behaviour and drought typically does not account for the timescale and the intensity of the drought. We use 19 years of GPS data from the African elephant (Loxodonta africana), a species at risk from drought, collected in Southern Africa, where droughts are increasingly common. We study if there is a connection (i) between drought and the amount of space elephants use and (ii) between drought and elephant habitat selection. We examine drought conditions using the Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) at a 1-month, a 3-month, and a 12-month timescale. We found that elephants had smaller home ranges and movement distances when their environment became drier at a 1-month timescale. Importantly, SPEI at a 1-month timescale was a better predictor of elephant home range size than precipitation and NDVI, suggesting that drought conditions may affect elephant movement through more ways than a lack of precipitation or vegetation greenness. In addition, we found that elephant habitat selection changed as a function of drought conditions at all three timescales, but the direction of the change often depended on the timescale of the drought. We found that elephants were closer to inland water and in areas with lower human population density during drought at a 1-month timescale, but farther from inland water and in areas with higher human population density when drought lasted longer. Overall, our results show that drought conditions, as measured by SPEI, predict elephant movement behaviour. We stress the importance of (i) using a drought index rather than only precipitation levels to examine drought conditions and (ii) considering the timescale at which drought occurs. These insights could help to better understand how animals behave during drought and to assess the risk of human-wildlife conflict across species, regions and drought timescales.

Indexed as

DroughtsEcosystemElephantsHoming BehaviorAnimalsclimate changehabitat selectionhome rangeLoxodonta africanamovement ecologyStandardized Precipitation‐Evapotranspiration Index

Identifiers

PMID42332377
PMCPMC13439595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.