Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332338›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Mike Tombu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mike TombuDefence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, 1133 Sheppard Ave West, Toronto, ON, M3K 2C9, Canada. mike.tombu@forces.gc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Night vision goggles (NVGs) enhance vision under scotopic conditions by amplifying near-infrared light and converting it to a wavelength that can be seen by the human visual system. Although significantly more expensive than monocular systems, binocular NVGs provide the user with independent inputs to each eye, and therefore facilitate stereopsis, the ability to discriminate differences in depth from binocular cues. Past work examining stereopsis through NVGs has been mixed, with early-generation systems showing no evidence for stereopsis while more-modern systems show some evidence for (and others against) stereopsis, albeit at levels below that observed under natural photopic viewing conditions. These studies have examined stereopsis through NVGs under ideal conditions that isolate binocular contributions to depth perception. In the present study, stereopsis through NVGs was examined under more realistic conditions and for more operationally relevant tasks. The results show that stereopsis through NVGs persists even under degraded viewing conditions and provides a binocular advantage for real-world tasks where the perception of depth plays an important role. These results show that limitations in stereoacuity through NVGs are not driven by visual acuity limits, as has been previously argued, and more generally a dissociation between visual acuity and stereoacuity.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionEye Protective DevicesNight VisionVision, BinocularVisual AcuityAdultHumansMaleYoung AdultBinocular disparityDepth perceptionNight vision gogglesStereopsisVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID42332338
PMCPMC13287262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.