Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332331›Full record

ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

Bibliometric analysis of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma research.

Bayram Deleş, Neriman Aral

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bayram DeleşDepartment of Child Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tarsus University, Mersin, Türkiye. delesbayram@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-240X
Neriman AralDepartment of Child Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9266-938X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head Trauma are significant traumatic brain injuries observed in infants and represent a critical public health issue. Although there is a vast literature on this subject, conducting a descriptive bibliometric analysis is essential to map the topic's quantitative development over time and to reveal its current geographical and conceptual distribution objectively. This study systematically analyzes 3,571 articles published between 1977 and 2025 in the Web of Science Core Collection database, examining the distribution of publications by year and country, leading journals, citation rates, and keyword networks. Our findings indicate a linear increase in the volume of SBS/AHT research publications since the 2000s. The analysis highlights two significant strengths and shifts in the literature. First, the emergence of countries from diverse regions-such as Romania, the United Arab Emirates, Malaysia, and Russia-in the literature network, alongside traditional research hubs, objectively confirms the subject's expanding global scope. Second, the fact that the highest citation rates and publication density are not limited to clinical medicine journals (e.g., Pediatrics) but are simultaneously concentrated in pioneering journals with social and legal content (e.g., Child Abuse & Neglect) highlights the field's multidimensional and interdisciplinary nature. In conclusion, this study provides an objective resource for all stakeholders-including physicians, forensic scientists, and legal professionals-by visualizing the current geographic diversity of scientific output, key terms, and journal dynamics.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiomedical ResearchChild AbuseCraniocerebral TraumaShaken Baby SyndromeHumansInfantAbusive head traumaBibliometric analysisBrain injuryChild abuseShaken baby syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.