ArticleBehavior research methods2026
A tutorial on causal network simulation and exploration using the causalnet R package.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how network structure influences system dynamics is essential for advancing psychological modeling. This tutorial introduces the causalnet R package, which enables researchers to systematically enumerate candidate directed networks by orienting a user-specified undirected or partially directed adjacency template. Users can impose directional constraints-such as those derived from prior theory or time-series models (e.g., graphical vector autoregressive models)-to restrict the space of admissible directed network configurations. The package supports dynamic simulations on these networks using either a theoretically grounded nonlinear model (Park et al., 2025) or a simplified linear alternative. Researchers can simulate system behavior and compare dynamic outcomes across structural configurations, parameter sets, or modeling assumptions. The primary audience is applied psychological and behavioral scientists who wish to evaluate competing theoretical accounts of symptom and behavior dynamics when causal direction is uncertain. Importantly, causalnet is not intended to identify a unique causal network from cross-sectional data; instead, it supports theory- and evidence-constrained enumeration of candidate directed structures and simulation-based screening of their dynamic implications against empirical targets. We illustrate how this workflow can be used to adjudicate competing psychological theories by linking structural assumptions to predicted dynamic signatures such as persistence and recovery. This approach facilitates a systematic exploration of how causal architecture and interaction dynamics give rise to the emerging dynamics of psychological processes over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.