Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332313›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Dermo-Glandular Suspension Following Wise-Pattern Explantation-Mastopexy: Is it Reaching the Intended Heights?

Matthew G Wedlich, Christian M Asher, Charles M Malata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew G WedlichDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-9880
Christian M AsherDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Charles M MalataDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom. cmalata@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe inferiorly based dermo-glandular sling is well described for implant coverage in post-mastectomy prosthetic reconstruction and attempted restoration of upper pole fullness in (therapeutic and aesthetic) mammaplasty procedures, to variable long-term effect. We reviewed the technique modifications by a single surgeon, over 13 years, and the aesthetic outcomes achieved, when used in the context of cosmetic breast implant removal.

methodBreast explant patients with a Wise-pattern skin incision by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2024 were identified. EXCLUSIONS: implant exchange, explantation only and LeJour pattern breast lift. Demographics and perioperative data were recorded. Perioperative photographs were assessed using the established Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment. Cosmetic Results (BCCT.core) software to analyse the aesthetic result.

results19 patients underwent implant removal and parenchymal re-draping with an inferiorly based dermo-glandular sling. Patients were: perimenopausal women (mean=54yrs) with raised BMI (mean=27.6kg/m

conclusionsAn inferior, de-epithelialised dermo-glandular sling can reliably rejuvenate the female breast following breast implant removal, where there is disharmony between parenchymal volume, distribution and envelope. We illustrate a reliable technique that achieves objectively good to excellent aesthetic results, with long-term efficacy. (249 words) Most common presentations for seeking explantation in our cohort were concerns about the degree of ptosis, pain, anxiety about BIA-ALCL and symptoms of breast implant illness. This technique offers a reliable and aesthetically robust option to restore some volume and uplift and reshape the explanted breast, in patients declining re-implantation or staged surgeries. Suitable patients as determined by our cohort are middle-aged women with large, previously augmented breasts (~330cc mean, 36E median), with an above-average BMI (27.6) yielding suitable inferior pole tissue for suspension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsDevice RemovalMammaplastyAdultAgedCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAugmentationBCCT.coreBreast implant illnessDermoparenchymal slingExplantationT-scar mastopexy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.