ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Serum biomarkers remain stable after transitioning from intravenous to subcutaneous natalizumab in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubcutaneous natalizumab offers greater convenience than intravenous administration, but pharmacokinetic differences have raised concerns about potential subclinical disease activity. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are sensitive biomarkers of neuroaxonal damage and astroglial activation.
methodsIn this prospective, single-center cohort study, consecutive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who transitioned from intravenous to subcutaneous natalizumab were followed for 12 months. Serum sNfL and GFAP were measured at baseline (prior to switch), and at 6 and 12 months using SIMOA technology. Additional clinical outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR), EDSS, and MRI activity.
results23 patients were included (mean age 43.7 years; 91% female). Median disease duration was 14 years (IQR 8.1-22), median time on natalizumab was 5 years (IQR 3.3-7.9), baseline 2-year ARR was 0.09 ± 0.2, and median EDSS was 2.0 (IQR 2.0-3.5). Median sNfL Z-scores were 0.2 (IQR - 0.3-0.6) at baseline, 0.1 (IQR - 0.4-1.0) at 6 months, and 0.5 (IQR - 0.4-1.1) at 12 months, with no significant change over time (p = 0.401). GFAP levels were similarly stable (87.7, 86.8, and 90.2 pg/mL; p = 0.957). ARR remained low and unchanged (0.09 pre- and post-switch; p = 1.0), with no radiological activity observed. EDSS remained stable over follow-up.
conclusionsIn this small real-world cohort, switching from intravenous to subcutaneous natalizumab was associated with stable sNfL and GFAP levels over 12 months, alongside stable conventional clinical and MRI outcomes. These findings provide supplementary biomarker evidence broadly consistent with existing clinical trial and real-world data, but should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.