Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332276›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

Direct inoculation of bioreactor-controlled stirred suspension culture with cryopreserved human pluripotent stem cells.

Kevin Cyrys, Felix Manstein, Wiebke Triebert, Nils Kriedemann, Carlos Alberto Hernandez-Bautista, Robert Zweigerdt

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin CyrysLeibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs, Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Cyrys.Kevin@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-527X
Felix MansteinLeibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs, Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9740-9686
Wiebke TriebertLeibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs, Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-1410
Nils KriedemannLeibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs, Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7767-1556
Carlos Alberto Hernandez-BautistaLeibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs, Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2846-9444
Robert ZweigerdtLeibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs, Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Zweigerdt.Robert@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-0770

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) EXC 62/2; ZW64/4-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The routine mass applications of human pluripotent stem (hPS) cell-derived progenies for regenerative medicine or high-throughput drug screenings will depend on the standardized supply of high-quality cells via controlled, efficient bioprocesses. Recent suspension culture (three-dimensional, 3D) strategies for hPS cell production in stirred-tank bioreactors (STBR) support this development. However, bioprocess inoculation still depends on adherent (two-dimensional, 2D) preculture, which is labor intensive, resource demanding and poorly controlled and limits process automation. Here we describe the controlled in-process production and dissociation of 3D cultured hPS cell aggregates directly in STBRs, tackling these challenges. The resulting cells can be used for the generation of high-density cryostocks, subsequently enabling the direct inoculation of 3D cultures, thereby entirely omitting the need for 2D preculture and the associated limitations. A key feature of this Protocol is the nonenzymatic, EDTA-based hPS cell aggregate dissociation approach in STBRs, enabling the impeller-based mechanical control of the dissociation process. The resulting cell suspension can be used for process reinoculation and seed train-based upscaling, as well as for the cryopreservation of produced hPS cells, ideally via controlled-rate freezing. Together, the protocol enables the efficient and flexible hPS cell suspension culture over multiple passages, maintaining karyotype stability and pluripotency. This Protocol can be easily implemented by any cell culture-educated scientist without extensive bioprocess training. Cell thawing requires 1 h, the 2D preculture requires 9 days, 2D cell passaging requires 1 h, bioreactor preparation requires 2 days, (direct) bioreactor inoculation requires 1.5 h, 3D STBR cultivation requires 3-4 days and STBR-based aggregate dissociation requires 2 h.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.