ReviewNature protocols2026
Direct inoculation of bioreactor-controlled stirred suspension culture with cryopreserved human pluripotent stem cells.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The routine mass applications of human pluripotent stem (hPS) cell-derived progenies for regenerative medicine or high-throughput drug screenings will depend on the standardized supply of high-quality cells via controlled, efficient bioprocesses. Recent suspension culture (three-dimensional, 3D) strategies for hPS cell production in stirred-tank bioreactors (STBR) support this development. However, bioprocess inoculation still depends on adherent (two-dimensional, 2D) preculture, which is labor intensive, resource demanding and poorly controlled and limits process automation. Here we describe the controlled in-process production and dissociation of 3D cultured hPS cell aggregates directly in STBRs, tackling these challenges. The resulting cells can be used for the generation of high-density cryostocks, subsequently enabling the direct inoculation of 3D cultures, thereby entirely omitting the need for 2D preculture and the associated limitations. A key feature of this Protocol is the nonenzymatic, EDTA-based hPS cell aggregate dissociation approach in STBRs, enabling the impeller-based mechanical control of the dissociation process. The resulting cell suspension can be used for process reinoculation and seed train-based upscaling, as well as for the cryopreservation of produced hPS cells, ideally via controlled-rate freezing. Together, the protocol enables the efficient and flexible hPS cell suspension culture over multiple passages, maintaining karyotype stability and pluripotency. This Protocol can be easily implemented by any cell culture-educated scientist without extensive bioprocess training. Cell thawing requires 1 h, the 2D preculture requires 9 days, 2D cell passaging requires 1 h, bioreactor preparation requires 2 days, (direct) bioreactor inoculation requires 1.5 h, 3D STBR cultivation requires 3-4 days and STBR-based aggregate dissociation requires 2 h.
Identifiers
42332276What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.