Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332264›Full record

ArticleNature immunology2026

Fate induction through asymmetric T cell division is modulated by chimeric antigen receptor costimulatory domains.

Caitlin S Frazee, Sisi Chen, Corbett T Berry, Casey S Lee, Reid A Banciella, Lucianna Ngo, David Shon, Patrick J Herman, Jake S Fischman, Chloe L Leff and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Caitlin S Frazee *Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2384-5586
Sisi Chen *Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Corbett T Berry *Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9348-2034
Casey S LeeDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Reid A BanciellaDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lucianna NgoDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David ShonDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Patrick J HermanDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jake S FischmanDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6907-5033
Chloe L LeffDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9036-4099
Anna ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yvonne KuoDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander A ShestovCenter for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andre R KellyCenter for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bakir ValenticCenter for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5253-0010
Michael C MiloneCenter for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Roddy S O'ConnorCenter for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-4544
Christoph T EllebrechtDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. chell@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-0491

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Study Design and Data AnalysisP30AR069589 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth Anne Grice · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
Deciphering novel cell death mechanisms and metabolic reprogramming in response to microenvironmental stress.R35GM159930 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Christoph Thomas Ellebrecht · 2025 to 2026
$894k
Asymmetric cell division for fate commitment of human T cellsK08AR080266 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Christoph Thomas Ellebrecht · 2022 to 2026
$867k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NIAMS NIH HHS K08 AR080266NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069589NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM159930U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) K08-AR080266U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) T32-AR007465U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35-GM159930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy can result in impressive remissions in hematological malignancies, but relapse is common because a minority of infused cells acquire a long-lived, memory-like state. All US Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR T cell products incorporate either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains, each conferring distinct phenotypic outcomes, but how these signals control early fate decisions is incompletely understood. Here we show that costimulatory domains control memory fate acquisition through asymmetric cell division. CD28 CAR T cells have higher CAR surface expression and enhanced surface proteome asymmetry after the first division, yet paradoxically they show muted transcriptional, epigenetic and metabolic divergence between daughter cells, correlating with reduced long-term persistence. Conversely, 4-1BB CAR T cells have less surface polarization but more pronounced transcriptional, metabolic and epigenetic divergence, yielding proximal effector-prone and distal persistence-prone daughters. Integrating surface proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and chromatin accessibility, we show how costimulatory domains tune asymmetric cell division to shape CAR T cell fate, providing a mechanistic foundation for optimizing cellular immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Asymmetric Cell DivisionImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsCD28 AntigensHumansImmunologic MemoryLymphocyte ActivationCD28 AntigensReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID42332264
PMCPMC13310772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.