ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
A Novel ConvNeXtV2-MIL Approach for Accurate and Efficient Classification of Microscopic Fungal Morphology.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal infections, especially in people with weakened immune systems, are a significant global health burden. Accurate identification of fungal morphology from microscopic images is a critical step in guiding timely antifungal treatment decisions. However, manual morphological assessment remains highly dependent on expert mycologists and is prone to inter-observer variability. In this study, we propose a hybrid deep learning framework that integrates the ConvNeXtV2-Base architecture with a Multi-Head Attention-based Multiple Instance Learning module for automated classification of microscopic fungal morphology images. The framework was evaluated on the open-access DeFungi dataset, consisting of 3696 microscopic images representing five clinically meaningful fungal morphology classes. In comparative experiments, classical vision transformer (ViT) models achieved 91.20% accuracy, while MIL-enhanced ViT models reached 93.99%. The proposed ConvNeXtV2-Base + MIL hybrid method outperformed all evaluated architectures, achieving 98.90% classification accuracy. These results establish a new benchmark for automated fungal morphology classification and highlight the potential of AI-assisted decision-support tools to aid expert mycologists in morphology-based assessment workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42332235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.