ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Autologous stem cell transplantation for AL amyloidosis: a multicenter summary of outcomes 2010-2020.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is central in AL amyloidosis and continues to be defined in the era of newer therapies. To evaluate contemporary patient selection, practice patterns, and outcomes, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter study across nine tertiary referral centers, including 1047 patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent ASCT between 2010 and 2020. Most patients (67.9%) received full-dose melphalan conditioning, and 66.5% received pre-ASCT induction therapy, predominantly proteasome inhibitor-based regimens. Day-100 all-cause mortality was 3.0%, representing a substantial improvement compared with historical cohorts. Post-ASCT hematological responses were satisfactory in 75.4% of patients. Among patients with paired assessments, ASCT deepened responses in 56.3% who had not achieved a complete response with induction therapy. With a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the median overall survival was 6.3 years. Independent predictors of inferior survival included age ≥60 years, bone marrow plasma cells ≥20%, pre-ASCT dFLC ≥40 mg/L, elevated cardiac biomarkers, lambda-restricted disease, reduced eGFR and reduced-dose conditioning. In this contemporary cohort, ASCT for AL amyloidosis demonstrated low early mortality, high rates of deep hematologic response, and durable survival in carefully selected patients. These findings support its role as an effective consolidative strategy, while its optimal positioning alongside emerging therapies requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42332218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.