Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332167›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2026

A SWOT Analysis of PrEPChoices: Developing a Web-Based Decision Aid Tool to Support HIV Prevention Decision-Making.

Carley Brissette, Kevin Le, Raquel Teper, Roman Shrestha, Pablo K Valente

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carley BrissetteDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Kevin LeDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Raquel TeperDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Roman ShresthaDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Pablo K ValenteDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. pablo.valente@uconn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2058-3472

Funding

Training in MHealth Prevention with MSMK01DA051346 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHRESTHA, ROMAN · 2020 to 2024
$862k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA051346University of Connecticut University of Connecticut
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) experience a heightened risk of HIV acquisition due to barriers to HIV prevention, specifically connected to a lack of comfort in discussing sexual identity and practices with healthcare providers (HCPs). Decision-aid tools that support communication and shared decision-making may improve both access to and uptake of numerous HIV prevention modalities among SGMY. The study aimed to inform the decision-making process of HIV prevention modalities for HCPs and SGMY, providing key information about HIV prevention modalities with PrEPChoices, a web-based decision aid tool. Our study recruited two participant groups, HCPs (N = 15) and SGMY (N = 18). Eligible HCPs held a Doctor of Medicine (MD), Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), Nurse Practitioner (NP), or Physician Assistant/Associate (PA) degree, were licensed to prescribe medications in at least one United States state, had provided care to patients aged 15 to 24 within the past month, and were 18 years of age or older. Eligible SGMY were assigned male sex at birth, reported sexual attraction to and/or sexual behavior with cisgender men or transgender women in the past six months, and were 15 to 24 years of age. Participants completed a semi-structured Webex interview focused on the clarity and relevance, presentation and usability, and application of PrEPChoices, a web-based decision aid tool to support HIV prevention modalities selection among HCPs and SGMY. Interview transcripts were coded using an iteratively developed codebook. Findings were thematically analyzed within a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis framework. Thirty-three participants enrolled (N = 33), including 15 HCPs and 18 SGMY. Strengths included: (1) support for HIV prevention-based decision making; (2) utilization of the filtering tool to select preferred HIV prevention modalities; and (3) intuitive website design. Weaknesses included: (1) gaps in needs and literacy levels between HCPs and SGMY; (2) limited visual design appeal and inclusive representation; and (3) limited in-tool features for comparing HIV prevention modalities. Opportunities included: (1) potential for multimodal dissemination; and (2) expanding external resources provided. Threats included: (1) challenge of integrating PrEPChoices into clinical practices; and (2) ability to stand out compared to other online HIV prevention education resources. HCPs and SGMY highlight the value of PrEPChoices as a web-based decision aid tool to enhance HIV prevention modality selection among SGMY. Our results emphasize the critical role PrEPChoices can play in reducing barriers to sexual health education among SGMY, improving the patient-provider relationship with the PrEP landscape, and strengthening HIV prevention among SGMY.

Indexed as

Decision aidPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)Sexual and gender minority youthShared decision-makingWeb-based interventions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.