Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332118›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Automated video-based AVPU assessment within a FHIR-enabled clinical decision support framework.

João C Ferreira, Pedro Faria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

João C FerreiraISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. joao.c.amaro.ferreira@himolde.no.
Pedro FariaISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and timely assessment of consciousness is critical for triage, escalation of care, and patient safety in emergency and hospital settings. However, documentation using the AVPU scale (Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive) remains inconsistent owing to high workload, subjectivity, and fragmented workflows. This study developed and evaluated Consc.ia, a video-based clinical decision-support platform that automates AVPU inference while preserving clinician oversight and enabling seamless, interoperable documentation through HL7 FHIR. A simulated AVPU dataset comprising 136 videos from 58 healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, paramedics, and first responders) was created under controlled conditions with ethics approval from the ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa Ethics Commission (reference CE-ISTA/2025.08, July 2025). The system architecture combines edge-computing computer vision for real-time extraction of facial landmarks, eye state, arm movement, and verbal responses; a clinician-in-the-loop validation layer; and FHIR-mapped Observation resources for direct EHR integration. Three deployment scenarios (Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Departments, and Intermediate Care wards) were designed and compared. Technology adoption was modelled using Rogers' Innovation Adoption Curve and the Bass Diffusion Model (p = 0.01, q = 0.35, M = 111 Portuguese hospitals). The architecture achieves low-latency inference with privacy-by-design (local processing, no raw video storage). Stakeholder validation confirmed strong workflow fit and highlighted persistent documentation gaps during EMS-to-hospital transitions. Scenario analysis revealed distinct hardware and integration requirements (ambulance edge device versus ward multi-camera server). Bass modelling projects gradual adoption, reaching approximately 50% of Intermediate Care wards by 2037 in the realistic scenario, with the "chasm" phase occurring between 2030 and 2032. Sensitivity analysis identified early clinical evidence and FHIR integration support as the strongest accelerators of diffusion. As this constitutes a proof-of-concept study, no quantitative AVPU classification metrics (e.g., accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, or confusion matrix) are reported at this stage; empirical model evaluation against expert-annotated clinical recordings is identified as the primary prerequisite for future validation and clinical translation. As a proof-of-concept that has not yet undergone clinical validation, Consc.ia offers a feasible, interoperable solution for standardising AVPU documentation and strengthening early warning systems. By combining video analytics, edge computing, clinician validation, and FHIR integration, the platform addresses a longstanding gap in emergency-care digitalisation and provides a clear roadmap for real-world adoption.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalVideo RecordingHumansAVPU scaleClinical decision support systemComputer visionConsciousness assessmentEdge computingEmergency careHL7 FHIRTechnology adoption modelling

Identifiers

PMID42332118
PMCPMC13572508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.