Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332113›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2026

Potential mechanisms and functional significance of aperiodic neural activity.

Michael Preston, Sydney Smith, Bradley Voytek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael PrestonNeurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. mpreston@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5689-3640
Sydney SmithDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5293-7247
Bradley VoytekNeurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-2525

Funding

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) NIH NIMH R61MH135109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human and animal electrophysiology often looks noisy and unstructured. While some clearer features exist in the form of bursty oscillations and event-related potentials, recent methodological developments have helped to uncover surprising structure in what otherwise looks like noise. This signal, referred to as aperiodic activity, has received substantial recent attention, examining its physiological generators and relationship to behaviour, cognition, development, ageing and disease. Here we examine the putative physiological basis of aperiodic activity, its relationship to other measures of neural activity and evidence for its functional and clinical relevance. Computational modelling and empirical evidence show that aperiodic activity has many neural origins, primarily postsynaptic transmembrane currents across populations of neurons. While several other signal statistics capture features similar to aperiodic measures, new methods have allowed researchers to more directly link aperiodic activity to underlying physiological processes. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of cognition and disease, and highlight open questions for future research.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsNeuronsAnimalsCognitionHumansModels, Neurological

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.