ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrated risk characterization of estragole, aristolochic acids, and pyrrolizidine alkaloids in natural products using margin of exposure and RISK21.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural products (NPs) including herbal teas are widely consumed in Malaysia but lack stringent regulation. Naturally occurring phytochemicals including estragole (genotoxic), aristolochic acids (AAs; Group 1 carcinogen) and certain pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs; Group 2B carcinogen) pose severe hepatotoxic and nephrotoxic risk. An integrated risk assessment using the Margin of Exposure (MOE) and the RISK21 framework was applied to 90 NPs (30 per compound). The samples were identified through National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA) QUEST3 + database and analyzed using validated UPLC-DAD and LC-MS methods. Estragole, AAs, and PAs were detected in 30% (55.0-418.0 µg/g), 16.7% (8.7-2256.3 µg/g), and 36.7% (0.02-21.1 µg/g) of samples, respectively. Lifetime exposure to estragole and AAs, and eight PA-positive samples, resulted in MOE values < 10 000, indicating high priority for risk management. RISK21 characterization placed AAs in the red zone, representing unacceptable risk. Notably, half of estragole-positive products targeted women's health, raising concerns for vulnerable populations, including potential neonatal exposure via breast milk. Furthermore, simultaneous product use may result in potential cumulative effects. Malaysians face significant long-term health risks from toxic phytochemicals in NPs, particularly AAs. The integrated framework provides a critical decision-support tool to strengthen regulatory oversight and enforce stricter quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42332081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.