ArticleScientific reports2026
Personalized talent cultivation and academic prediction framework for higher education based on the HA-GNN-LSTM architecture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the dilemma of homogeneous talent training and the efficiency bottleneck of human resource management in universities, this study proposes an innovative personalized training framework integrating artificial intelligence, big data, and deep learning. Based on the 18-dimensional full-cycle behavior dataset of 5,000 students and OULAD dataset, a multimodal heterogeneous data fusion pipeline is constructed. This study adopts Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) for data imputation and bias optimization, designs Hierarchical Attention Graph Neural Network (HA-GNN) to capture hierarchical correlations among features, and uses Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to model temporal behavior patterns. The experimental results demonstrate that, under 10 independent repeated runs with random seed variation, the Hierarchical Attention Graph Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (HA-GNN-LSTM) model achieves lower prediction error on the academic performance prediction task, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 4.2 ± 0.3. Compared with the Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) baseline model, MAE is reduced by 31.1%. Welch's two-tailed t-tests based on independent run results remain statistically significant after Holm-Bonferroni multiple comparison correction [Formula: see text]. The Normalized Discontinued Cumulative Gain at Top 5 (NDCG @ 5) index of personalized recommendation system reaches 0.90, which verifies the effectiveness of spatio-temporal feature modeling. At the management application level, the improvements in advisor allocation response time and resource idle rate are derived from simulation experiments based on historical data replay, rather than online deployment in real campus management systems. The simulation results demonstrate that, under established constraints and historical sample distributions, advisor allocation response time could be reduced by 60% and resource idle rate could be decreased by 63.4%. These findings indicate the framework's potential for optimizing educational resource allocation. However, its managerial benefits require further validation through subsequent real-world deployment and long-term follow-up studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.