ArticleCommunications biology2026
Cross-frequency coordination in a hippocampo-cortical circuit during probabilistic reversal learning.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning under uncertainty requires detecting latent changes in environmental contingencies and flexibly adjusting choice strategy. To examine hippocampo-cortical circuit dynamics during probabilistic choice behavior, we trained rats on a two-armed bandit task with uncued reward reversals while recording local field potentials from dorsal hippocampus (CA1d), lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). Performance improved across sessions, shifting from outcome-reactive exploration to exploitation, quantified using a model-free index. Mixed-effects modeling identified session-averaged cortical synchrony in theta and fast-gamma bands as a negative performance marker. Theta and gamma oscillations were coordinated, with CA1d theta coupled with fast-gamma in PFC, and modulated slow- and fast-gamma bursts in LEC, selectively increasing at goal-reaching. Neuronal spiking showed pathway-specific phase-locking, with theta-dependent spike timing across hippocampo-cortical pairs and reciprocal slow-gamma phase-locking most evident between CA1d and LEC. Distributed spiking was modulated during goal approach, with sustained peri-goal ramping in PFC putative single units, whereas hippocampal and entorhinal populations showed transient suppression around nosepoke onset. These results identify a session-averaged LEC-PFC connectivity marker of task performance and dissociate it from hippocampal theta mechanisms organizing cortical gamma bursts and spike timing during peri-goal processing, providing a circuit-level framework for adaptive decision-making under uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42332000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.