ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics guided semantic consistency learning for bearing fault diagnosis in agricultural machinery under operating condition shifts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rolling bearings in agricultural machinery operate under pronounced operating-condition shifts, such as speed and load fluctuations and contamination-related noise, which often induce a distribution mismatch between training and deployment signals. This work studies bearing fault diagnosis under a source-only, single-source domain generalization (DG) setting, where the model is trained and selected using only source-domain data, and samples from the target operating condition or target dataset are not used for training, validation, hyperparameter selection, band-pass selection, or early stopping. We formulate cross-condition robustness as a semantic consistency problem between two complementary representations: an analytic mechanism-oriented representation emphasizing impact-related resonance demodulation, and a data-driven temporal representation learned from raw waveforms. A dual-path framework is developed accordingly. The analytic path learns a differentiable soft band-pass mask to localize an informative resonance band and constructs an impulse-oriented descriptor from statistics of the band-pass signal, its Hilbert envelope, and squared-envelope energy. The temporal path encodes normalized raw segments using a lightweight dilated one-dimensional convolutional network with temporal-attention pooling. The two embeddings are fused by a sample-wise gate, with an entropy penalty used to discourage near-uniform averaging. This design aims to improve cross-condition generalization by using the analytic path as a mechanism-oriented semantic anchor, constraining the temporal path through cross-view agreement, and allowing the fused representation to adapt to sample-dependent reliability changes. To reduce representation drift under regime changes, the two views are aligned using a bidirectional InfoNCE objective with a learnable temperature that adapts similarity scaling across operating conditions. A mechanism-critical control is also reported: replacing the analytic path with same-dimensional non-mechanistic features consistently degrades cross-condition performance, indicating that the analytic anchor is not interchangeable with generic auxiliary branches. Experiments on CWRU, SEU, and an agricultural-machinery-relevant test-rig dataset show in-domain accuracies of 99.48%, 98.50%, and 97.53%, respectively. In strict cross-speed evaluation on the test-rig dataset, the method achieves 98.22% accuracy when trained at 1500 r/min and tested at 2000 r/min, and 98.03% accuracy in the reverse setting. In cross-dataset evaluation using the shared normal, inner-race, outer-race, and rolling-element fault classes, the proposed method achieves the best average performance among the evaluated source-only baselines, including generic DG methods and recent bearing-diagnosis generalization methods. These comparisons include DPICEN and a protocol-matched single-source adaptation of FARNet, denoted FARNet-SS, both evaluated without target-domain access during training or model selection. The model remains lightweight, with 0.1348 M parameters and 127.11 M FLOPs for the neural forward pass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.