ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid analysis of photovoltaic energy data containing excessive structural zeros.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photovoltaic (PV) power generation plays a critical role in the global transition toward sustainable energy systems. However, accurate PV power forecasting remains challenging due to the non-stationary nature of PV power time series and the presence of structural zeros. Most existing studies rely on parametric models or treat zero inflation as a secondary issue. In this study, a hybrid hurdle modeling framework is implemented to explicitly account for both structural zeros and continuous positive power values through a two-part structure. The zero component is modeled using Bayesian logistic regression (BLR), random forest classifier (RFC), and support vector classifier (SVC). The positive values are analyzed using the parametric models Gamma regression (GR), Log-normal regression (LNR), and Weibull regression (WR) and the non-parametric machine learning (ML) techniques random forest regression (RFR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and support vector regression (SVR). The proposed framework is validated using the target variable active power (AP, kW) based on a real-world data from a 110 kWe (129.6 kWp) PV plant located in Çaycuma, Zonguldak, Türkiye. Four metrics were used to compare the predictive performances of the models: mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute (scaled) error (MAE and MASE), and the coefficient of determination ([Formula: see text]). Among the 18 distinct hurdle models, the lowest error values and the highest [Formula: see text] were obtained when the positive component was modeled by either RFR, such as BLR-RFR (MSE = 67.425 kW, MAE = 3.974 kW, MASE = 0.615, [Formula: see text] = 0.899) or XGBoost, such as RFC-XGBoost (MSE = 69.252 kW, MAE = 4.075 kW, MASE = 0.630, [Formula: see text] = 0.898). The findings indicate that hybrid modeling approaches where the zero component is modeled using BLR, RFC, or SVC, and the positive component is modeled with either RFR or XGBoost provide a reliable framework for PV power forecasting, when predicting continuous data characterized by excessive structural zeros.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.