ArticleScientific reports2026
Forward model of rat electroencephalogram: influence of inhomogeneous and anisotropic skull.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The forward modeling of electroencephalogram (EEG) plays a crucial role in solving source localization and, consequently, in the detection of EEG connectivity networks in the rat brain. We investigated the impact of skull tissue properties-inhomogeneities, anisotropy, and thickness-on measured skull potentials. Five cuboid head phantoms with identical geometry, differing in skull material parameters, and a realistic head phantom with varying skull anisotropy ratios were tested. Simulations were verified by four electromagnetic solvers and an EEG measurement on a physical phantom. The cuboid phantom with sutures yields similar electric potentials as the isotropic one, but noticeable differences appear at electrodes near sutures, particularly in real brain sensing of somatosensory, motor, and visual cortices, as well as the retrosplenial dysgranular cortex, for a dipole located close to the surface. Skull thickness reduces potentials at the top electrodes but increases them at side electrodes, in real brain sensing somatosensory, auditory, association, and entorhinal cortices. Skull anisotropy alters electric potentials with differences up to 60% for dipoles near electrodes at the limiting anisotropy ratio of 10:1, and its effect decreases with increasing distance. Varying anisotropy ratios (10:1 to 1.3:1) show that nearby dipoles are the most affected, while the impact is reduced for lower, more realistic ratios (1.3:1 to 1.8:1) and for more distant sources. This trend was consistently observed in realistic head phantoms as well. Tangential dipoles are most strongly affected in the vicinity of the electrodes and gradually become radial at more distant positions near the inner skull surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.