Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42331925›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Physics-based data augmentation to enhance deep learning performance in tropical cyclone and storm surge modelling.

Takumu Iwamoto, Tomohiro Takagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takumu IwamotoTsunami and Storm Surge Group, Port and Airport Research Institute, Yokosuka, Japan. iwamoto-t@p.mpat.go.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8125-2143
Tomohiro TakagawaTsunami and Storm Surge Group, Port and Airport Research Institute, Yokosuka, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP25K17697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate modelling of tropical cyclones (TCs) is essential for reliable storm surge simulations, as TCs provide the primary external forcing. While deep learning models have demonstrated effectiveness in TC modelling, a challenge remains regarding the limited diversity of TCs in reanalysis data used for training-specifically, the scarcity of extreme TC events. This study proposes a physics-based data augmentation method that utilizes a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model to physically generate TCs lying beyond the range of reanalysis data. Subsequently, focusing on small-sized yet intense TCs as extreme cases, a model-originally pre-trained solely on reanalysis data-was fine-tuned using this augmented dataset to convert a parametric TC model (PM) field into an NWP-like field. Validation using test data mimicking extreme TCs and a storm surge hindcast of TC Faxai (a compact, intense TC that struck Tokyo Bay in 2019) revealed that the PM failed to simulate storm surges where topographic effects on the wind field are significant, and the pre-trained model underestimated wind speeds and storm surges. In contrast, the fine-tuned model successfully captured the spatiotemporal features of the extreme TCs and the peak storm surges upon TC landfall, achieving the lowest RMSE for storm surges across all TCs and tide gauges. These results suggest that physics-based data augmentation can effectively extend the applicability of deep learning models for TC and storm surge modelling to extreme events.

Indexed as

Data augmentationFine-tuningMachine learningStorm surgesTropical cyclones

Identifiers

PMID42331925
PMCPMC13572487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.