ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-based data augmentation to enhance deep learning performance in tropical cyclone and storm surge modelling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate modelling of tropical cyclones (TCs) is essential for reliable storm surge simulations, as TCs provide the primary external forcing. While deep learning models have demonstrated effectiveness in TC modelling, a challenge remains regarding the limited diversity of TCs in reanalysis data used for training-specifically, the scarcity of extreme TC events. This study proposes a physics-based data augmentation method that utilizes a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model to physically generate TCs lying beyond the range of reanalysis data. Subsequently, focusing on small-sized yet intense TCs as extreme cases, a model-originally pre-trained solely on reanalysis data-was fine-tuned using this augmented dataset to convert a parametric TC model (PM) field into an NWP-like field. Validation using test data mimicking extreme TCs and a storm surge hindcast of TC Faxai (a compact, intense TC that struck Tokyo Bay in 2019) revealed that the PM failed to simulate storm surges where topographic effects on the wind field are significant, and the pre-trained model underestimated wind speeds and storm surges. In contrast, the fine-tuned model successfully captured the spatiotemporal features of the extreme TCs and the peak storm surges upon TC landfall, achieving the lowest RMSE for storm surges across all TCs and tide gauges. These results suggest that physics-based data augmentation can effectively extend the applicability of deep learning models for TC and storm surge modelling to extreme events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.