Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42331915›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Discriminant compounds and a predictive S-score for the manual grading standard of Jasminum sambac.

Jiping Wang, Ye Zhang, Tiedong Lu, Zhongyi Li, Tianming Su, Tieguang He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiping Wang *Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 53007, Guangxi, China.
Ye Zhang *Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 53007, Guangxi, China.
Tiedong LuInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 53007, Guangxi, China.
Zhongyi LiInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 53007, Guangxi, China.
Tianming SuInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 53007, Guangxi, China. sutianming04@126.com.
Tieguang HeInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 53007, Guangxi, China. tghe118@163.com.

Funding

Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2026YT148Specific Research Project of Guangxi for Research Bases and Talents AD19245202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jasmine (Jasminum sambac) is a highly valued aromatic plant, widely used for scenting tea and extracting essential oils. Flower quality directly influences the market value of these products. However, the classification of jasmine flowers currently relies on empirical visual inspection and mechanical sieving, lacking objective chemical markers. In this study, freshly picked commercial jasmine buds (grade A and grade B) and fully bloomed flowers (grade I and grade II) were analyzed to examine differences in their volatile compound profiles using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). According to the general commercial grading standards used by growers and tea companies, 25 compounds differed significantly between grade A and grade B buds, while 134 compounds differed significantly between grade I and grade II opened flowers (P < 0.05). Intersection analysis identified six compounds common across grade comparisons. By comprehensively evaluating their fold changes and relative abundances, three compounds-(E)-3-Hexen-1-ol, Caryophyllene, and (E,E)-3,5-Octadien-2-one-were selected as potential markers. Based on the current dataset, the S-score provides an objective, data-driven approach to distinguish jasmine flower grades. However, as a preliminary model, its proposed threshold (S > 9.5) requires independent validation using samples from different seasons, regions, or production batches before any practical application.

Indexed as

Commercial jasmine gradeQuality gradingS-scoreVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID42331915
PMCPMC13572483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.