ArticleScientific reports2026
Discriminant compounds and a predictive S-score for the manual grading standard of Jasminum sambac.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Jasmine (Jasminum sambac) is a highly valued aromatic plant, widely used for scenting tea and extracting essential oils. Flower quality directly influences the market value of these products. However, the classification of jasmine flowers currently relies on empirical visual inspection and mechanical sieving, lacking objective chemical markers. In this study, freshly picked commercial jasmine buds (grade A and grade B) and fully bloomed flowers (grade I and grade II) were analyzed to examine differences in their volatile compound profiles using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). According to the general commercial grading standards used by growers and tea companies, 25 compounds differed significantly between grade A and grade B buds, while 134 compounds differed significantly between grade I and grade II opened flowers (P < 0.05). Intersection analysis identified six compounds common across grade comparisons. By comprehensively evaluating their fold changes and relative abundances, three compounds-(E)-3-Hexen-1-ol, Caryophyllene, and (E,E)-3,5-Octadien-2-one-were selected as potential markers. Based on the current dataset, the S-score provides an objective, data-driven approach to distinguish jasmine flower grades. However, as a preliminary model, its proposed threshold (S > 9.5) requires independent validation using samples from different seasons, regions, or production batches before any practical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.