ArticleScientific reports2026
Tobacco smoking behavior and health outcomes among patients with chronic diseases: a comparative study of tobacco-producing and non-producing areas in southern Thailand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tobacco use remains a substantial cause of morbidity among patients with noncommunicable diseases, especially in areas with localized tobacco production. This study looked into the tobacco smoking behavior and, adverse health outcomes, and predictors of smoking behavior among chronic disease patients in both tobacco-producing and non-producing areas of Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand. An analytical cross-sectional study was undertaken with 879 patients with chronic disease in tobacco producing and non-producing districts. Participants were recruited via simple random sampling from local primary care patient registries, with a fixed allocation technique. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews with a verified structured questionnaire. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify predictors of smoking status. The overall smoking rate was 19.3% (7.5% current and 11.8% former). Males accounted for 98.5% of individuals who had previously smoked. High morbidity was noted, with 28.8% of smokers having COPD and 54.7% requiring at least four hospitalizations per year. Traditional hand-rolled tobacco (Yasen) dominated usage, especially in production regions (88.1% vs. 75.0%). Multivariable analysis found that females had 99.6% lower odds of smoking (AOR: 0.004, 95% CI: 0.002-0.009). Patients from non-planting areas (AOR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.77) and low-income households (AOR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.95) had considerably decreased smoking odds. While current prevalence is lower than national averages. Geographic closeness to production and higher household income both contribute to smoking in this group. Therefore, Interventions have to address physical and economic accessibility to traditional tobacco in agricultural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.