ArticleScientific reports2026
Radiation shielding and microstructural characteristics of nano-silica and nano-alumina modified cement composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing use of nuclear technology in medicine, industry, and energy requires effective durable radiation shielding. This study aimed to develop and characterize nano-modified cementitious composites for enhanced gamma-ray shielding with quantitative structure-property relationships. Two-year-aged cementitious composites were prepared by partially replacing ordinary Portland cement with 5 wt% nano-silica or nano-alumina, labeled Si-C and Al-C, respectively, alongside unmodified cement (B-C) as a reference. Comprehensive multi-scale characterization included density measurement, surface area and porosity analysis (BET), particle size and colloidal stability assessment (DLS and zeta-potential), phase analysis (XRD), morphological observation (SEM-EDX), and chemical bonding analysis (FTIR). Density values were 2.78, 2.81, and 2.92 ±0.01 g·cm[Formula: see text] for Si-C, B-C, and Al-C, respectively. BET analysis showed that Si-C and Al-C have 3.1-4.4-fold higher surface areas (290.11-416.07 m[Formula: see text]/g) and smaller pores (6-9 nm) than B-C (94.64 m[Formula: see text]/g, 28.82 nm). DLS/zeta-potential measurements showed particle sizes of 48.4 ±2.1 nm (Si-C) and 78.8 ±3.5 nm (Al-C) with -15.6 to -17.8 mV zeta-potentials versus B-C (1718 ±35.2 nm, -2.0 mV), confirming enhanced electrostatic stabilization and nano-modifiers dispersion. Quantitative XRD phase analysis revealed that Si-C exhibited significantly higher tobermorite content (53.6%) compared to B-C (37.7%) and Al-C (35.5%), indicating enhanced pozzolanic reactivity and C-S-H gel formation. Gamma-ray shielding parameters-including linear and mass attenuation coefficients (LAC, MAC), half- and tenth-value layers (HVL, TVL), effective atomic number (Z[Formula: see text]), and exposure and energy absorption buildup factors (EBF, EABF) were evaluated over an energy range of 1 keV to 100 GeV. Calculations were performed using the Py-MLBUF (Python Machine Learning Buildup Factor) code, and the Py-AMA.Seidy model, validated against NIST XCOM data (differences <0.4%). Al-C showed the highest LAC (53.37 cm[Formula: see text] at 0.015 MeV) and the lowest HVL and TVL, consistent with its highest density and increased Al/Fe content. The Z[Formula: see text] values ranged from ∼ 11.8 to ∼ 17.3, with Al-C exhibiting the highest values. Buildup factors (EBF/EABF) at 1 mean free path (mfp) were lowest for Al-C, indicating reduced secondary photon contribution. Double-layer shielding analysis revealed that placing B-C as the first layer, followed by Si-C or Al-C reduced double-layer buildup factors by 15-25% compared to the reverse order. Microstructural characterization confirmed that nano-silica promoted a dense, homogeneous C-S-H-rich matrix with high tobermorite content, while nano-alumina increased density and promoted C-A-S-H formation. The established structure-density-shielding relationships demonstrate that Al-C is a promising candidate for advanced radiation shielding in nuclear, medical, and industrial facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.