Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42331876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Interpretable deep learning for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy diagnosis: a multi-center study.

Juan Miranda Bautista, Javier Llorente Peris, Fernando Ybáñez Carrillo, Lara Lloret Iglesias, José A Vega, Pablo Menéndez Fernández-Miranda

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan Miranda BautistaRadiology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain. juan.bautista@urjc.es.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-6627
Javier Llorente PerisRadiology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Ybáñez CarrilloRadiology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
Lara Lloret IglesiasAdvanced Computing and E-Science Research Group, Instituto de Física de Cantabria (IFCA), CSIC-UC, Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0157-4765
José A VegaDepartment of Morphology and Cell Biology, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1276-0018
Pablo Menéndez Fernández-MirandaRadiology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-8955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reliable deployment of artificial intelligence systems in medical imaging requires high diagnostic performance, robustness and interpretability. In this study, we developed and evaluated two automated frameworks for binary classification of shoulder radiographs (XRs) using deep learning (DL) and hybrid DL-machine learning (ML) approaches. A convolutional neural network (CNN) based on a fine-tuned VGG19 architecture was trained end-to-end on a large, balanced dataset of 4,268 shoulder XRs. In parallel, hybrid models were constructed by extracting deep feature representations from the trained network and combining them with traditional ML classifiers. Model performance was evaluated on independent internal (n = 480) and external (n = 308) validation sets. Both approaches achieved high discriminative performance. Paired comparison of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves using the DeLong test revealed no statistically significant differences between the end-to-end CNN and the hybrid CNN-ML pipeline for either internal validation (AUC 0.956 vs. 0.961) or external generalization (AUC 0.940 vs. 0.942). Model interpretability was assessed using Grad-CAM and SHAP values. Our results suggest that while both frameworks are robust, the end-to-end DL approach offers a more streamlined workflow and more direct visual explainability via saliency maps. These findings support the potential of AI-based tools for shoulder XR analysis; however, prospective real-world validation, assessment under routine prevalence conditions, and direct comparison with human readers are still needed before clinical integration can be established.

Indexed as

CalcinosisDeep LearningRotator CuffTendinopathyConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansNeural Networks, ComputerROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID42331876
PMCPMC13287596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.