ArticleScientific reports2026
A self-orchestrating physics-discovering neural architecture for adaptive and fault-resilient robotic motion control via RPA and digital twins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To autonomously control a robot's movement in complex and unpredictable environments, adaptive models must be developed that can continuously learn about and refine their future physical dynamics. This paper introduces a Self-Organising Physics Discovered Neural Architecture (SOPDNA) that unites Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) with Robotics Process Automation (RPA) and Digital Twin DT technologies to create an entirely automated, robust robotic motion control system. In contrast to traditional robotic motion control systems that rely on predefined mathematical models or offline training methods, SOPDNA automatically discovers previously unknown physical relationships between robotic motion components and continuously updates the controller policy during operation. The Digital Twin software acts as a nearly identical simulation environment to enable extensive self-experimentation and safety verification of SOPDNA while the RPA software automates all aspects of the SOPDNA learning process, including acquiring experimental data, detecting anomalies, retraining the learning model, and deploying optimised controllers, without requiring any human oversight. The core of SOPDNA consists of a PINN that incorporates a comprehensive mathematical representation of the robot's physical constraints and uses symbolic regression techniques to estimate unmodelled dynamic variables, such as variable friction coefficients and environmental disturbances. Experimental validation using a robotic manipulator performing trajectory tracking and obstacle avoidance under changing payloads shows the proposed approach's capabilities. The SOPDNA framework provides an overall trajectory-tracking accuracy of 98.4%, a 22.7% reduction in energy usage, and a 30.9% improvement in disturbance rejection when compared to traditional deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID)-based control systems. Results from the fault-injection experiments show SOPDNA's ability to recover from degradation of actuators 41.3% faster than conventional methods. Overall, these findings support the potential for self-organising physics-discovered neural network architectures to enhance the development of robust, adaptive, intelligent robotic motion control systems capable of autonomously executing complex tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.