ArticleScientific data2026
A Million-Scale, Difficulty-Stratified Optical-Microscopy Image Annotation for Neuron Reconstruction.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Million-Scale, Difficulty-Stratified Optical-Microscopy Image Annotation for Neuron Reconstruction.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate reconstruction of neuronal morphology is a cornerstone for understanding the structure and function of neural circuits. Despite significant advances in imaging and reconstruction techniques that have greatly expanded the scale and quality of neuronal data, existing public datasets still lack large-scale, high-quality, and well-annotated resources, limiting their utility for training and evaluating modern AI models. In this study, we present an open, graded neuronal dataset covering the entire mouse brain. Leveraging high-resolution optical microscopy, we combined automated reconstruction with multi-user collaborative proofreading to generate high-precision neuronal annotations. Our dataset was derived from 10,547 neurons across 258 whole-brain samples, and approximately 8,092,547 standardized data units with graded difficulty levels were generated through an interactive collaborative reconstruction process. Moreover, the dataset supports both API access and bulk downloads, offering researchers convenient data acquisition methods. This work fills a critical gap in standardized, annotated whole-brain neuronal resources, provides a high-quality benchmark for AI-driven automated neuronal reconstruction, and lays a solid foundation for building large-scale neural circuit maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42331847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.