ArticleNature communications2026
Cluster replicability in single-cell and single-nucleus atlases of the mouse brain.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The misplaced mouse Pax6 interneuron subclass: A cross-species transcriptomic reassignment.iScience · 2026Article
- Coordinated dysregulation of modular gene activity in human neuropathologies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing has advanced our understanding of cellular heterogeneity. Ensuring the replicability of identified cell clusters across studies is essential for determining their biological robustness. We assess the replicability of cell clusters identified in two large mouse brain atlases, one generated using single-cell RNA sequencing and the other with single nuclei. Both profile over 4 million cells and group them into over 5,000 clusters. Using transcriptome-wide neighbor voting, we identify 2,009 reciprocally matched cluster pairs with consistent spatial localization and coordinated gene expression, which were also observed in datasets from multiple species. Reciprocal clusters are enriched in the cerebellum, where lower diversity aids replicability, while the hypothalamus's heterogeneity limits agreement. Distinguishing close clusters is much more challenging than differentiating a cluster from most others, especially when using marker genes. By incorporating replicability data, we provide a stronger foundation for investigating the atlas-defined clusters and their biological meaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.