Trial reportOrthopaedic surgery2026
Clinical Study of Ultrasound-Guided Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy Combined With Medical Chitosan in Lumbar 4-5 Disc Herniation Treatment.
Trial report in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a preferred minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH); however, postoperative recurrence, nerve root damage, and hyperesthesia continue to present key clinical challenges. Chitosan represents a novel preventive approach against postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) plus medical chitosan in treating lumbar 4-5 disc herniation (L4-5 LDH).
methodsTotally, 200 L4-5 LDH patients were prospectively recruited and randomly divided into the control group (ultrasound-guided PEID) and observation group (ultrasound-guided PEID plus medical chitosan). Low back and leg pain and lumbar dysfunction were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA). Efficacy and postoperative complications were evaluated according to the modified MacNab criteria. Logistic regression analyses identified the risk factors. Mann-Whitney U test was used for inter-group comparisons, and the Kruskal-Wallis test for timepoint comparisons.
resultsThe two groups showed significant differences in pre-treatment Pfirrmann classification and operation time. As time progressed, patients exhibited reduced VAS and ODI scores and increased JOA scores postoperatively. Significant differences were observed in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores in the observation group at 2 weeks postoperatively. The observation group demonstrated superior treatment efficacy and a lower complication incidence than the control group. Age, disease course, and postoperative bleeding were independent risk factors affecting clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided PEID plus chitosan.
conclusionUltrasound-guided PEID plus medical chitosan reduces postoperative pain and perioperative complications, demonstrating superior clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.